To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And, like I said, KDE4 and Qt4 expose functionality is graphics drivers that no other software does.
Since earlier open source drivers for ATI were reverse engineered (as opposed to designed from OEM specifications), no doubt there are shortcomings in those drivers. Wait for the new drivers to come out (which won't be long now), the ones that have been designed after the specifications were made available.
I'm sorry, the drivers provide enough features to implement things as simple as drawing lines, rectangles and images. I can understand transparency and such requiring more advanced functionality (although it works fine with Compiz and kompmgr), but that does not in any way explain 2d performance, which is pretty well-optimized at this point.
Which simply illustrates one of the poor design decisions at the foundation of KDE4.
Yes, Lemur, you've been spinning that as an excuse for months or years. But at the end of the day, users don't care about excuses. They care about having something that works.
Edited 2009-08-05 03:55 UTC
Have you tried EXA?
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIRadeon
I wouldn't be complaining like this if I hadn't already spent time tweaking my drivers. EXA is now the default for the Radeon driver and I've been using it for years. I've even tweaked it further by changing the FBTexPercent option in xorg.conf, which actually improves 2d performance significantly, at the cost of 3d performance (which I don't really care about most of the time).
Again, KDE 3.5.10 and to a lesser extent GTK+ apps are all responsive and quickly drawn. It's only Qt4 and KDE4 apps that make me feel like I'm using drivers from 3 years ago.





Member since:
2006-01-02
I'm using the Open Source drivers and, like I said, they work great for everything but KDE4 and Qt4.