To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The issue is that just keeping up with all the changes in the FOSS/linux software stack is a lot of work, and improving things is another hunk. They're just too much short on ppl and without commitment from Canonical (which invests 99% in Gnome despite having 30% KDE users) it's not gonna improve.
So why not work with Mandriva - they really seem to be focused on KDE (not that they have a bad GNOME implementation - actually I've read shining reviews of Mandriva from GNOME users as well). I think I read somewhere that KDE is looking for a "shocase" distribution - if that's true, you need to find one that already has a good "baseline". As far as I know (and I have tested the big four - Kubuntu/OpenSuse/Mandriva/Fedora - Mandriva is by far the most polished of all, and they seem to help out with other parts of the KDE software stack (like porting K3B to QT4).





Member since:
2006-01-18
if they do work on kubuntu, they need to do more - kubuntu is the worst KDE distro i've ever used, and not improving.