Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Aug 2009 00:12 UTC, submitted by rexstuff
Thread beginning with comment 377507
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That doesn't mean many people don't describe large parts of GTK as a 'steaming pile of shit' and similar things
And that doesn't mean that other developers think the contrary and they use it, your bitterness and ignorance towards GTK put in evidense to you and to the project you are representing.
Edited 2009-08-06 15:37 UTC
Agreed, I was a bit fed up with the heat and some other comments over here. Despite that, I think you'd have a hard time finding serious developers (who dont' care about the C vs C++ thing) who prefer GTK over Qt.
Sure, a few purists, and we've got plenty of those. But that's always going to be a 1% minority...
Anyway. Who cares what's better or worse. That wasn't the topic at all.







Member since:
2005-07-07
I was of course way over the top, it's more like 5 years. And even then some parts of GTK (examples being Cairo and Clutter) are more or less on equal foot with the other toolkits. That doesn't mean many people don't describe large parts of GTK as a 'steaming pile of shit' and similar things. I haven't had a close look myself but I guess the vast majority of developers I speak with (both Qt and GTK and independent devs) is probably right.
(ok, the windows toolkit is, afaik, in most area's, Qt-5 as well. Mac is, from what I understand from ppl who seem to know it, about equal - but different of course.)