Linked by mufasa on Mon 10th Aug 2009 12:25 UTC
Web 2.0 The web browser has been the dominant thin client, now rich client, for almost two decades, but can it compete with a new thin client that makes better technical choices and avoids the glacial standards process? I don't think so, as the current web technology stack of HTML/Javascript/Flash has accumulated so many bad decisions over the years that it's ripe for a clean sheet redesign to wipe it out.
Thread beginning with comment 377903
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Thanks for wasting my time
by Laurence on Mon 10th Aug 2009 14:05 UTC in reply to "Thanks for wasting my time"
Laurence
Member since:
2007-03-26

To the author: Don't write articles where a *nice sun shines trough the clouds and will guide you to the path of salvation* . I want F***ing TECHNICAL details. Such a time waste.. (making it worse by commenting). Just try one thing : remove the terms thin and fat client in the article. This will force you to be much more specific. Cheers, zimbatm


I modded you down because of your use of language - it was totally unnecessary.

Suggestion: If you're that unhappy with this article then could always write a follow up piece instead of swearing at those that bothered to give up their own free time for you.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Thanks for wasting my time
by _df_ on Mon 10th Aug 2009 14:19 in reply to "RE: Thanks for wasting my time"
_df_ Member since:
2005-07-06

the problem is, anyone can come up with ideas but wishing does not make it so.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Thanks for wasting my time
by dagw on Tue 11th Aug 2009 07:09 in reply to "RE: Thanks for wasting my time"
dagw Member since:
2005-07-06

If you're that unhappy with this article then could always write a follow up piece

This article is like writing an article saying we should switch to cold fusion plants for at least 50% of our power needs sometime within the next 20 years. Without a detailed technical description of how these plants can actually be built the article doesn't say much.

Also writing a follow up piece is kind of pointless since all it would say "sure, but how?"

Reply Parent Score: 2