Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Aug 2009 23:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 378363
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, not for optimized algorithms.
Adobe should've used Qt anyways. That way separate code bases for Mac and Windows GUIs would be avoided. Adobe had to port all GUI anyway when they moved from Carbon to Cocoa.
Adobe should've used Qt anyways. That way separate code bases for Mac and Windows GUIs would be avoided. Adobe had to port all GUI anyway when they moved from Carbon to Cocoa.
Then again, using cross platform toolkits generally means that the program looks and feels "not quite right" on all the platforms it runs on, so I feel like it makes more sense for them to develop "native" guis for each target platform.




Member since:
2006-07-26
I thought they used it for Photoshop elements. If they used Qt wouldn't they get PPC support for free?