Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Fri 14th Aug 2009 02:29 UTC
Linux It's the end of the world. Again. According to some Linux developers and security researchers, a bug in the Linux kernel has just been uncovered that makes just about every distribution utilizing kernel 2.4 and 2.6 on just about all architectures since May of 2001 vulnerable to a certain kind of attack.
Thread beginning with comment 378464
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: WinXP
by Moredhas on Fri 14th Aug 2009 05:15 UTC in reply to "WinXP"
Moredhas
Member since:
2008-04-10

True, but now Linux fan boys like me can take a different tack: The Worst Bug Ever in Linux is patched. UAC still has a gaping intentional loophole so Microsoft can let Notepad.exe run as admin. When a security hole is found in Linux, it gets fixed. When one is found in Windows, Microsoft either clam up, blame the users, or issue a patch years late.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 22

RE[2]: WinXP
by UZ64 on Fri 14th Aug 2009 05:35 in reply to "RE: WinXP"
UZ64 Member since:
2006-12-05

True, but now Linux fan boys like me can take a different tack: The Worst Bug Ever in Linux is patched.

LMFAO. Nice wording. ;)

Admitting to being a fanboy while proving a point is always funny. [No real arguments against your point, though.]

Edited 2009-08-14 05:37 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: WinXP
by LighthouseJ on Fri 14th Aug 2009 06:18 in reply to "RE: WinXP"
LighthouseJ Member since:
2009-06-18

The problem is you think that *this* is the worst bug ever found.

You don't know what you don't know. There could be plenty more egregious ones out there, ones that can rival Windows ones.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[3]: WinXP
by Beta on Fri 14th Aug 2009 08:05 in reply to "RE[2]: WinXP"
Beta Member since:
2005-07-06

The problem is you think that *this* is the worst bug ever found.

It may be the worst bug found so far.

You don't know what you don't know. There could be plenty more egregious ones out there, ones that can rival Windows ones.

And there could be plenty more egregious ones in Windows that haven’t been discovered aswell.
Well done for making a non-point.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: WinXP
by brandonlive on Sun 16th Aug 2009 22:15 in reply to "RE: WinXP"
brandonlive Member since:
2008-05-31

You completely misunderstand UAC if you think that is the case.

Running apps with different privileges on the same desktop is risky on all major OSes. But it's actually less risky on Windows than on most other OSes thanks to the secure desktop consent prompt (much safer than the non-SAS password model used on most *nix OSes and OS X), UIPI, etc.

Still, on any OS, if you're super paranoid then you're best off using separate user accounts and avoiding sudo / UAC like mechanisms.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: -1