To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That wasn't a kernel bug, and wasn't even a bug that effected upstream - you didn't even realize it was actually SSL, not SSH...
That bug was specific to distros based on Debian, because the maintainer of SSL decided to cut corners to make maintenance easier for himself.
Anyway, when Microsoft finally patches the UAC bug that allows escalated privileges - apparently by design - then Windows users can feel free to point at things like this in Linux.
Since Microsoft has stated the flaw is there on purpose, it'll never get patched... this flaw is already patched, it just needs to be applied to current installations.
Your FUD / lies about Windows aren't appreciated.
There are no known bugs that allow privilege escalation across security boundaries on Windows. A standard user account cannot attain admin privileges without admin credentials. And there are no known vectors for going from Low IL to Medium/High IL without user consent in the default configuration (there are medium -> high vectors on Win7, but they're by design - an option exists to disable them in the UAC control panel. But for most users that is a non-issue. Running High IL apps on the same desktop is risky to begin with since ILs are not a security boundary).






Member since:
2005-09-08
No this is not the worst by far. It is a privilege escalation bug, that's pretty common and not that dangerous to the common linux user. It only makes trojans more dangerous, but the virus'es and trojans has to get in first. This is mainly means local users can get more privileges, but local users are usually employees or device owners.
No, the most serious bug in Linux was the big one in ssh, which allowed remote access to most linux server (used in Matrix 2, btw).