Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Aug 2009 17:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 378744
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-02
Probably because nobody has bothered to make this work from top to bottom of the client-side stack. No toolkit tries to make it work, so why should XLib devs bother making it work? There have been a few posts on the X.org mailing list regarding XLib's policy of aborting on failure and how it's wrong and apps should be able to reconnect, but there wasn't enough interest to do anything about it. It clearly is a more sane solution, though.