Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Aug 2009 17:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 378890
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: where's the point?
by Kochise on Sun 16th Aug 2009 20:29
in reply to "RE[4]: where's the point?"
So little what ? Gimme JUST a raw average of man/hour spend by the community on all the Linux distro, then multiply by an average coder's $$$/hour to get the "actual monetary investment" spent on it (the time spent on Linux ain't spent on something else, other coding or else) Plus that Linux is 15 years old, and should have grown better, brighter, ...lighter also !
Kochise
RE[6]: where's the point?
by zombie process on Sun 16th Aug 2009 21:23
in reply to "RE[5]: where's the point?"





Member since:
2005-07-08
Because, despite arguments to the contrary, $$$ (and fear of losing house and home) is a far greater motivator of men than having their name tied to some open/free code or rep++. The amazing thing isn't that linux/bsd/whatever isn't ahead of windows in whichever metric you'd choose to discuss, the amazing thing is that it's so close to parity with so little actual monetary investment.