Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Aug 2009 18:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 379342
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Wow, there must be a lot of string theorists in the world then.
64-bit cpus on non-retarded OSs[1] can be significantly faster than 32-bit cpus on everyday tasks, and can take advantage of the massively increased address space available to them, this is already an issue for people who, for example, use VMs that have high RAM requirements.
[1] Look up the windows AMD-64 callspec to see what I mean
RE[2]: No 64-bit naysayers?
by AaronD on Wed 19th Aug 2009 18:16
in reply to "RE: No 64-bit naysayers?"
I am not one of those naysayers. I didn't buy a 64-bit processor to only use half of it. My point is that when anything 64-bit comes up a hardware guru somewhere likes to tell us that 32-bit is just as good.
Usually when that happens I like to "extend" that logic and say that 8-bit trumps all.




Member since:
2009-08-19
I can't believe that there are 54 comments here without anyone chiming in to tell us how useless 64-bit is unless your trying to simulate string theory or something.