Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Aug 2009 09:34 UTC, submitted by moochris
Thread beginning with comment 379565
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Actually, if anything, the speed of development has been steadily increasing - you can see that just by looking at the OSNews archive of Haiku-related posts in chronological order.
There were things missing, but calling it useless is a large exaggeration.
And yet, in all of that time, no OS has surpassed (or even caught up to) BeOS in the aspects that made it compelling to me.
But, in many instances, those changes have been in Haiku's favour - E.g., the prevalence of multi-core processors and netbooks.
I don't agree - as with the development pace of the OS, every indication I've seen is that the Haiku community has been growing at a steadily-increasing rate.
But even if, hypothetically, no one ends up using Haiku except for the people who developed it, I expect they would still consider it to have been a worthy endeavour.
And I personally dislike the idea that an OS is a failure if it doesn't have a huge userbase. When the number of computer users is in the hundreds of millions (if not billions by now), there's plenty of room to carve out a niche.