Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 20th Aug 2009 09:43 UTC
What else would we talk about other than the massively [popular|controversial] article about X.org last week. We try and address a number of concerns about the article and common lines of reasoning / misunderstanding. Lastly, we move onto something completely different with topics on Google Chrome on Linux, IE6 and the two details we know about RockMelt: Rock. Melt.
Thread beginning with comment 379818
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-24
Chant, chant, chant, Thom. You are still chanting that mantra. You shouldn't have included, even featured, so many unrelated troll points, and unrestrained overstatements, if you had intended your all-over-the-board troll-piece^Weditorial to make a single point well. This is what I meant in the previous thread when I said that it was poorly written. You could have written it differently, in a more focused, intelligent, and less (intentionally) provocative way, and a much different family of threads would have resulted. But you didn't. As it stands... you're reaping what you sewed, Thom.
And also as it stands, the statement quoted above is quite false. Think about it.
Edited 2009-08-20 23:27 UTC