Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Thread beginning with comment 380237
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Relying to programmers
by lego on Mon 24th Aug 2009 12:01 UTC
Member since:

Decisions are made by programmers and not by marketing experts.
Here is the explanation.
This is the same for Wordpress developers that made the foolish decision to make revisions the default status and so annoy the whole Web (including hosts).

Reply Score: 1