Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Thread beginning with comment 380246
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
reasons why Linux is suks
by Luca on Mon 24th Aug 2009 13:01 UTC
Member since:
RE: reasons why Linux is suks
by Soulbender on Mon 24th Aug 2009 13:42 in reply to "reasons why Linux is suks"
Soulbender Member since:

Ah yes, a page on a Russian site filled with porn and "contact" ads is surely the place to go for accurate and professional Linux (or any, for that matter) information.

Reply Parent Score: 2