Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 380303
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?
by Soulbender on Mon 24th Aug 2009 16:07
in reply to "RE[2]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?"
Typical linux user, I do know because i have read, i am talking about the average desktop user like your mom or aunt, who will not take 30 min
What makes you think a cryptic "System Files" (what's a system file?) or "Program Files" is easier for the novice user? Not to mention the litter under the "Windows" folder. Oh yeah, that stuff is a breeze for the un-initiated.
Either you have very strong sense of sarcasm or your a dumb***
Maybe you can enlighten us then. How do I find out exactly what files an installer installed and where in Windows?
RE[4]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?
by postdiction on Mon 24th Aug 2009 16:47
in reply to "RE[3]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?"
"Typical linux user, I do know because i have read, i am talking about the average desktop user like your mom or aunt, who will not take 30 min
What makes you think a cryptic "System Files" (what's a system file?) or "Program Files" is easier for the novice user? Not to mention the litter under the "Windows" folder. Oh yeah, that stuff is a breeze for the un-initiated.
Either you have very strong sense of sarcasm or your a dumb***
Maybe you can enlighten us then. How do I find out exactly what files an installer installed and where in Windows? "
lol, I like your attempts at making a point.
RE[4]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?
by dragossh on Mon 24th Aug 2009 18:36
in reply to "RE[3]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?"
What makes you think a cryptic "System Files" (what's a system file?) or "Program Files" is easier for the novice user? Not to mention the litter under the "Windows" folder. Oh yeah, that stuff is a breeze for the un-initiated.
Gee, I don't know. Maybe a system file is a file that is required by the system and should not be deleted? And maybe Program Files contains the files needed by programs to run. Wow! It is logical.
Maybe you can enlighten us then. How do I find out exactly what files an installer installed and where in Windows?
Browse to \Program Files\Program and there are your files. Your user files are either there or in \Documents and Settings\User\AppData on XP, and in \Users\User\AppData in Vista.
RE[3]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?
by abraxas on Mon 24th Aug 2009 17:51
in reply to "RE[2]: Whats wrong with a logical file system?"
Typical linux fanboy, I do know because i have read, i am talking about the average desktop user like your mom or aunt, who will not take 30 min to read how to use linux when she already knows how to use windows or a mac
You're missing the point. Average Windows users have no clue where things go when they download them nevermind when they install software. There is absolutely nothing inherently superior or easier about Windows' filesystem layout to the average user. Linux is quite sane actually if not a little confusing at first.
Either you have very strong sense of sarcasm or your a dumb***
You're making a fool of yourself by calling someone else dumb.





Member since:
2009-07-08
...not bin, sbin, opt, boot, usr, mnt, media, etc....
What is not logical about that? Just because you have not bothered to take the 30 minutes or so, that it would take to read up on and gain a good understanding of the Linux File Hierarchy Standard? If they put the binaries in boot, mounted removable media to bin and the bootloader files in mnt - I might see why that is not logical.
Typical linux fanboy, I do know because i have read, i am talking about the average desktop user like your mom or aunt, who will not take 30 min to read how to use linux when she already knows how to use windows or a mac
installing a program in linux is a guessing game as to where the files actually went.
Yes, because 'rpm -ql ' or 'dpkg -L ' is so very difficult
Either you have very strong sense of sarcasm or your a dumb***
Edited 2009-08-24 16:05 UTC