Linked by Kroc Camen on Mon 24th Aug 2009 13:09 UTC
Linux user Tess Flynn joins us to follow up on the feedback from last week's episode about Xorg.
Thread beginning with comment 380325
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: I want to hear more on XOrg future
by FishB8 on Mon 24th Aug 2009 18:57
in reply to "RE[3]: I want to hear more on XOrg future"
+1
I don't understand why people seem to portray X.org as some stagnant chunk of code suffering from bit-rot developed back in 1984 and still hanging around for the sake of nostalgia.
Ever since X.org forked from XFree86, they've been doing a complete overhaul that is only about 3/4 done. So yeah, there is a lot of old depreciated sub-systems in it still, but the new developments are fantastic.
I don't think the new Gallium3D library get's nearly enough press, moving the 3D acceleration code out of the drivers and into a common library.
@ideasman42 : who let you out of your cage??? Get back to work on the Blender code!
RE[5]: I want to hear more on XOrg future
by Lennie on Mon 24th Aug 2009 19:33
in reply to "RE[4]: I want to hear more on XOrg future"
RE[5]: I want to hear more on XOrg future
by _txf_ on Tue 25th Aug 2009 11:39
in reply to "RE[4]: I want to hear more on XOrg future"





Member since:
2007-07-20
totally agree, but this isn't something the OSNews guys know much about? - would be great if they could interview someone who is involved with some of the XOrg development.
Edited 2009-08-24 16:55 UTC