Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 380329
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Relying on PPAs doesn't really solve the issue, as you still depend on whoever maintains the PPA and its choice of distribution. As for building your own packages, you shouldn't do that unless you want to be their maintainer.
I'm not saying that standalone packages is the way to go. However, pretending that everything is solved by using repositories is burying your head deep in the sand. There is room for improvement.
Relying on PPAs doesn't really solve the issue, as you still depend on whoever maintains the PPA and its choice of distribution.
But you always depend on someone doing the package, even on windows.
Distro dependency is not a real issue anymore; you have a right to complain if you are using Ubuntu (which is the de facto standard now) and you still can't install the package. People running everything else are on their own, and they know it - it's the life they have chosen.





Member since:
2008-12-26
Ubuntu is not dependent on central repositories either. Anyone can create a PPA where you can build and upload your "unofficial" packages. Or just upload the .deb you built yourself somewhere people can find it.