Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Thread beginning with comment 380343
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
jabbotts
Member since:
2007-09-06

Assembly and customization is the responsibility of the distribution; same with car manufacturer's assembling commodity parts and customizing the appearance; same with soup vendors taking the same vegitables and putting there own spin on the cooking and flavour; same with toothbrush manufacturers customizing the look and rigidity of a stick with bristles on one end; same with ... ...

I just don't get why it's somehow special when it comes to Linux based platforms yet no one has an issue with choosing a breakfast cereal or any other product category that offers more than one choice. If one doesn't like how one manufacturer assembled the car or Linux based platform, look at another manufacturer.

Reply Parent Score: 3