Linked by David Adams on Mon 24th Aug 2009 09:21 UTC
Linux A reader asks: Why is Linux still not as user friendly as the two other main OSes with all the people developing for Linux? Is it because it is mainly developed by geeks? My initial feeling when reading this question was that it was kind of a throwaway, kind of a slam in disguise as a genuine question. But the more I thought about it, the more intrigued I felt. There truly are a large amount of resources being dedicated to the development of Linux and its operating system halo (DEs, drivers, apps, etc). Some of these resources are from large companies (IBM, Red Hat, Novell). Why isn't Linux more user-friendly? Is this an inherent limitation with open source software?
Thread beginning with comment 380419
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bill Shooter of Bul
Member since:
2006-07-14

I'm not arguing with you because I don't believe you actually believe what you are arguing.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Moulinneuf Member since:
2005-07-06

I'm not arguing with you because I don't believe you actually believe what you are arguing.


No , your too coward to argue with me using your real name because then you would have to face the consequence of your lies , You don't believe your argument are worth putting your real name beside them.

Reply Parent Score: -1

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

So, where's the proof? You claim Linux is number one everywhere, but you need to back that up.

Lets start simple for you. Show me proof for either Linux being number in phones, or being number one on desktops.

Good luck!

Reply Parent Score: 1