Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Aug 2009 22:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 380856
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-20
I am not a big fan of FSF.
But regardless of me and my opinions, this is extremely bad PR.
Negative campaigns are always obnoxious. Even more so in certain parts of the world; here for instance U.S. presidential elections are always tormenting to watch. In some parts of the world negative campaigns are considered insulting. For these reasons, FSF's offensive strategy often feels distasteful and frankly, disgusting.
When you have to rely on negative publicity, there is already something wrong in your organization.