Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Aug 2009 22:05 UTC
Legal The week isn't even over yet, and we already have another instalment in the Apple-Psystar soap opera. Psystar has filed a new lawsuit in the Florida Southern District Court in Miami, asking for an injunction and damages because of Apple's "anticompetitive attempts to tie Mac OS X Snow Leopard to its Macintosh line of computers".
Thread beginning with comment 381346
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: ...
by haus on Fri 28th Aug 2009 23:50 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: ..."
haus
Member since:
2009-08-18

"I'm pretty certain the EULA doesn't say anything about making a profit by re-selling OS X."

Then it has nothing to do with a double standard then. It just has to do with how they want to protect their own resources.

Apple isn't obligated to help their competitors. On that note, they're not obligated to hurt them either. Because they're a business, they're going to go after those that utilized their property to make money. There is little motivation to go after those that utilized their property... just so they can show it off to their dorm room friends.

Edited 2009-08-28 23:53 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: ...
by umccullough on Fri 28th Aug 2009 23:58 in reply to "RE[5]: ..."
umccullough Member since:
2006-01-26

Apple isn't obligated to help their competitors. But they're not obligated to hurt them either. because they're a business, they're going to go after those that utilized their property to make money.


I suspect it would still be their property if they hadn't sold it retail...

Reminds me of the days when satellite TV providers allowed you to purchase a receiver, and then demanded you weren't allowed to modify the equipment and/or re-sell it. These days, most satellite TV equipment is "leased" (in the U.S.) so they can at least claim it isn't your property now.

Apple has stepped in the same mess.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[7]: ...
by apoclypse on Sat 29th Aug 2009 01:54 in reply to "RE[6]: ..."
apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17

So has every other software company o the planet. You don;t actually own the software you run you license it. You can own the media its on though.

Reply Parent Score: 2