Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Aug 2009 22:05 UTC
Legal The week isn't even over yet, and we already have another instalment in the Apple-Psystar soap opera. Psystar has filed a new lawsuit in the Florida Southern District Court in Miami, asking for an injunction and damages because of Apple's "anticompetitive attempts to tie Mac OS X Snow Leopard to its Macintosh line of computers".
Thread beginning with comment 381378
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Psystar is right
by FredFlintStone on Sat 29th Aug 2009 02:54 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Psystar is right"
FredFlintStone
Member since:
2009-08-29

Again with Microsoft's OEM copies its not restricted to a single OEM and the OEM copies are not available over the shelf for sale. Which is why apple actions might be considered as anti- compete. If apple would have given snow leapord as a free upgrade to Leapord this case would have been thrown out in a minute. But its selling it as a separate product.

Reply Parent Score: 1