Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Aug 2009 22:05 UTC
Legal The week isn't even over yet, and we already have another instalment in the Apple-Psystar soap opera. Psystar has filed a new lawsuit in the Florida Southern District Court in Miami, asking for an injunction and damages because of Apple's "anticompetitive attempts to tie Mac OS X Snow Leopard to its Macintosh line of computers".
Thread beginning with comment 381383
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Moulinneuf
Member since:
2005-07-06

Mac OS X is a ( yet to be judged illegal based on false claim of property rights ) BSD , MIT , GPL LGPL , etc derivative.

99.8% of Mac OS X was not created by Apple ... nor do they own the technology or creation behind it.

Apple is now using other generic computer parts to create it's own branded computers.

100% was not created by or for Apple ... nor do they own the technology or creation behind it.

------

Apple is not given the right to close others technology creator technology , that they themself borrowed to do their solution because they are re/branding it.

Psystar is actually doing it right by chalenging something they don't like , in court.

Funny that you mentionned Red Hat ( Fedora ) because they have a couple cases where people argued Red Hat was Free Software so people could do anything they want with Red Hat product.

Red Hat argued , in court , that the code was not the problem , but that their branding was their own , and the court agreed with them.

Apple is the one crying for special measure and treatment here.

Apple are blocking people from servicing needs and wants on Mac OS X that they themself refuse to cover and convey.

That's anti competitive.
That's illegal.
That's blocking innovation and creation.
That's against Free Trade.
That's against social-capitalism.

Apple can't even argue , this time , that Psystar pirated or stole their copy of Apple Mac OS X.

Reply Parent Score: 2

google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

That's anti competitive.
That's illegal.
That's blocking innovation and creation.
That's against Free Trade.
That's against social-capitalism.


That made my day dude

Reply Parent Score: 2

nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

Mac OS X is a ( yet to be judged illegal based on false claim of property rights ) BSD , MIT , GPL LGPL , etc derivative. 99.8% of Mac OS X was not created by Apple ... nor do they own the technology or creation behind it.


So Aqua is less than 1% of OSX? That's pretty impressive given the size of xorg.

I find it funny how you are the biggest gpl advocate here and yet obviously are not a programmer or even have any idea as to how much work goes into something like OSX.

It only comfirms my previous experiences with gpl advocates which is that the most vocal don't produce anything of value. They just want all programmers to give their work away for free.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Moulinneuf Member since:
2005-07-06

So Aqua is less than 1% of OSX?


"Aqua is the graphical user interface and primary visual theme of Apple Inc.'s Mac OS X operating system."

That's pretty impressive given the size of xorg.


http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/MacOSX/Concept...

Your comparing a user interface to a X video server ...

how you are the biggest gpl advocate here


I am not advocating the GPL ... I am against closing of Free software and removal of access to Open Source development. I don't advocate that everyone use it either.

obviously are not a programmer


Obviously not only a programmer ... I am a User , teacher , student , developer , visonary , programmer , dismantler and many other things ...

even have any idea as to how much work goes into something like OSX.


Not that much actually , they use and perfect others work , that took decade and millions more man hours and often close to billions dollas of devlopments to get a result. Not denigrating it's importance here , or quality here , just that it's perfectionist improvments
based on larger body of works of others.

It only comfirms my previous experiences with gpl advocates


You seem to be calling anyone you disagree with as GPL advocates ... Regardless if true or not.

which is that the most vocal don't produce anything of value.


That quote is so funny on this day :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/28/newsid_2...

They just want all programmers to give their work away for free.


Free as in Freedom , sure , Free as in gratis , seing as Free Software is the biggest money maker of all IT time ... I don't know maybe your lying to yourself and to others because your imagining the world in a bubble.

Reply Parent Score: 1

0brad0 Member since:
2007-05-05


So Aqua is less than 1% of OSX? That's pretty impressive given the size of xorg.


Beyond Darwin, OS X compromises of a hell of a lot more than just Aqua.


I find it funny how you are the biggest gpl advocate here and yet obviously are not a programmer or even have any idea as to how much work goes into something like OSX.

It only comfirms my previous experiences with gpl advocates which is that the most vocal don't produce anything of value. They just want all programmers to give their work away for free.


Everything he says comes across as crazy gibberish. He's nothing but a loud troll that goes non stop like a broken record.

Reply Parent Score: 5

rockwell Member since:
2005-09-13

[q]Mac OS X is a ( yet to be judged illegal based on false claim of property rights ) BSD , MIT , GPL LGPL , etc derivative. 99.8% of Mac OS X was not created by Apple ...[q]

I see your point, but I'd say Apple created way more than .2% of OS X ...

Reply Parent Score: 2