To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Getting Chrome bundled at the factory could look anti-competitive - raising antitrust concerns - if the strategy is effective and Chrome gains significant market share.
Companies competing against Google may try to use these concerns as a lever for pressing the government to take action.
Being pursued for antitrust, even if there was no grounds for reasonable complaint to begin with, is not in the interest of any company.
If you had told me in 1989 that Windows was going to be the center of antitrust action against Microsoft I wouldn't have believed you; Windows was a marginal product that came bundled with some DTP programs, and OS/2 was the future.
What a different a decade makes. I wouldn't want Google to go down that road, especially when it doesn't have any clear implications for their core business: advertising.






Member since:
2006-01-26
Did you mean: trolling
Anyway, it's a healthier one. I think only other giants can compete, so the need of corporate monsters and incentivate being more of them can be a solution for monopoly.
We live in the age corporations as those economical empires are more powerful and influential than governments.
Just think of Godzilla, Heedorah and others fighting. Maybe the world will to the corporate wars, but there will be no other choice.
Edited 2009-09-02 12:34 UTC