Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Sep 2009 12:41 UTC, submitted by nitsudima
GNU, GPL, Open Source David Chisnall casts a critical eye over the GNU General Public License and asks whether it's done more harm than good for the Free Software movement. "Looking back, has the GPL been a help, or a hindrance? And will it continue to be a help or hindrance in the future?"
Thread beginning with comment 381960
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How is GPL to blame for that?
by ven- on Wed 2nd Sep 2009 15:46 UTC
ven-
Member since:
2009-08-24

It's hardly the GPL's fault if shitty code gets merged into upstream or if a company decides to not even distribute something publicly.

The GPL wants to make sure that free code stays free and achieves that just fine.

I agree that it's a bit too radical in some areas but that's only a problem because of the proprietary hell we currently live in.

Reply Score: 3