Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Sep 2009 19:20 UTC
Apple has responded to Psystar's new lawsuit today, stating that it is nothing but a stall tactic on Psystar's end. While I could just paraphrase whatever the filing reads, I decided to take this opportunity to address a number of sentiments and analogies often made in comment threads (not necessarily on OSNews).
Thread beginning with comment 382000
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I can't make up my mind on pystar.
by krreagan on Thu 3rd Sep 2009 03:27
in reply to "RE: I can't make up my mind on pystar. "
Member since:2008-04-08
RE[3]: I can't make up my mind on pystar.
by Kochise on Thu 3rd Sep 2009 11:58
in reply to "RE[2]: I can't make up my mind on pystar. "
Member since:2006-03-03
RE[2]: I can't make up my mind on pystar.
by Mellin on Thu 3rd Sep 2009 18:41
in reply to "RE: I can't make up my mind on pystar. "
Member since:2005-07-06
Member since:
2006-03-03
"If they win, Dell and every other big computer maker will jump on the bandwagon killing their margins."
Ain't that good for competition ? About the margin moto, I bet that if Psystar can produce and sell lower amount of higher end computers with full priced legit copies of Mac OS X, all of this for a fraction of the price asked for the original computers issued from a large company like Apple, that "margin" is just astonishing, to say the least.
Of course Apple cannot cope to suffer its "margin" level being known (that's why they dropped some lawsuit points on Psystar) and they surely don't want their monopoly being brusted ! On a more sardonic note : if Apple computers "costs an eye or an arm", Psystar's costed Jobs a liver...
Kochise