Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Sep 2009 19:20 UTC
Law and Order Apple has responded to Psystar's new lawsuit today, stating that it is nothing but a stall tactic on Psystar's end. While I could just paraphrase whatever the filing reads, I decided to take this opportunity to address a number of sentiments and analogies often made in comment threads (not necessarily on OSNews).
Thread beginning with comment 382193
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I hope Psystar wins ...
by JeffS on Thu 3rd Sep 2009 16:00 UTC in reply to "RE: I hope Psystar wins ..."
JeffS
Member since:
2005-07-12

You are one serious prick, and ignorant beyond description.

I don't like Apple, therefore I'm evil. Got it.

Now go back to masturbating at your Steve Jobs shrine, fanboy.

Seriously, I'm a dissatisfied Apple customer. That is my right to not be happy with the products and services that I have purchased from them. They failed to deliver the value for the money that I expected.

And the exploding iPhone has been filmed, and has come from several different sources.

I want to like Apple because they are great competition for Microsoft. And they make slick products with slick marketing. I just don't like their attitude towards customers.

I also don't like EULAs. So shoot me.

And yes, if I buy a hammer, I can do whatever the hell I want with it, short of using it to hurt someone.

And I don't like the unreasonable restrictions that come with EULAs.

But I know I'm wasting my typing with you, that's for sure. You are such a ridiculous Apple worshiper, you're beyond hope.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

rhavyn Member since:
2005-07-06

You are one serious prick, and ignorant beyond description.


Good, then you should be able to point out all of the mistakes I made in my post.

I don't like Apple, therefore I'm evil. Got it.


Strawman, I never called or implied that you're evil.

Now go back to masturbating at your Steve Jobs shrine, fanboy.


Sure, pointing out your lack of legal knowledge makes me an Apple fanboy, that seems like a rock solid logical conclusion to me.

Seriously, I'm a dissatisfied Apple customer. That is my right to not be happy with the products and services that I have purchased from them. They failed to deliver the value for the money that I expected.


You failed to point out one single instance of you being an Apple customer and having a dissatisfying experience with them. How is anyone else supposed to know what you have or have not done unless you tell them.

And the exploding iPhone has been filmed, and has come from several different sources.


Link please.

I want to like Apple because they are great competition for Microsoft. And they make slick products with slick marketing. I just don't like their attitude towards customers.


Great.

I also don't like EULAs. So shoot me.


Seems like shooting you would be going overboard a bit. You should really talk to someone about this repress rage though.

And yes, if I buy a hammer, I can do whatever the hell I want with it, short of using it to hurt someone.


Aha, a restriction. Now go look at the restrictions associated with, for example, a smoke detector. Really, there are restrictions on everything you buy.

And I don't like the unreasonable restrictions that come with EULAs.


How are they unreasonable?

But I know I'm wasting my typing with you, that's for sure. You are such a ridiculous Apple worshiper, you're beyond hope.


I sacrifice a goat in the name of Steve Jobs every morning. Oh, and you seem to have failed to respond to any of the points I made in my email, much less show that I am "ignorant beyond description." So I'll be eagerly awaiting your description of how EULAs violate the constitution and "directly" conflict with fair use. You should probably start with rebutting the copyright clause and the interstate commerce clause, you're going to need to defeat both of those to get past the unconstitutional thing.

Edited 2009-09-03 16:55 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2