Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Sep 2009 12:08 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu It's no secret that when it comes to KDE-based distributions, Kubuntu isn't exactly the cream of the crop. With the release of Kubuntu Karmic Alpha 5, the KDE4 desktop delivered with Kubuntu received some much-needed love. Let's take a look at what the Kubuntu people are doing.
Thread beginning with comment 382435
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
mgl.branco
Member since:
2009-07-22

Because the work of upstream goes to waste if the packagers screw it up.


Then, isn't fault of kubuntu devs for not having packaged according to upstream guideline or because of not having enough feedback from devs upstream so they get things right?. Just ask.

Kubuntu is the most important delivery route of the software to end users, mainly because the popularity of Ubuntu dwarves the other distros.


I wasn't awared of Ubuntu being the centre of the universe.

Jokes aside, I don't think Ubuntu is the *main* KDE "distribution channel". If KDE is to make it to a wider audience is not gonna be Kubuntu, IMHO.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Then, isn't fault of kubuntu devs for not having packaged according to upstream guideline

If I had a nickel for every time I've read "It sounds like your distro didn't package KDE4 properly" I'd be rich.

And yet upstream refuses to get involved in packaging. Go figure.

The KDE devs have said over and over again that they do what they do for fun. And that is quite cool. Fun, love, and respect are about the only motivators out there that are worth a damn.

But doing something for fun does not automatically translate into something that is optimally usable by others.

Edited 2009-09-04 23:11 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

mgl.branco Member since:
2009-07-22

And yet upstream refuses to get involved in packaging. Go figure.


I mean, there should be a reciprocal feedback between KDE and distros so they can integrate the DE well. But not packaging. Why KDE devs should loose time packaging for an specific distro when they should be putting its whole efforts into closing bugs, developing the best DE they can...?. then, what is a distro supposed to do then if packaging is not their thing?.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

simon_edwards Member since:
2009-09-05

And yet upstream refuses to get involved in packaging. Go figure.


Many of the developers who do KDE packaging are also working directly in/on KDE. Or you could say that a lot of KDE people are also doing packaging but their "distro" cap on.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2