Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Sep 2009 19:41 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 383302
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There are custom platforms / appliances built around Linux or xBSD that'll do pretty much whatever you want.
Here are but 2 examples:
Untangle Open Source Network Gateway
http://www.untangle.com/home
Vyatta - Routing, BGP, VPN forwarding, virtualizable
http://www.vyatta.com/products/product_comparison.php
While the networking part is also getting some serious love, I'm not sure that it's ever going to be competitive with Cisco or Juniper. Linux or the BSDs still aren't at that level.
Juniper (and many other vendors) use FreeBSD as a base for their systems and are contributing a lot of code back, check this for example:
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3835746
For easy tasks, they work, but if you need firewall, content inspection, routing and QOS, it starts becoming a head-ache.
It seems you have not spent much time with Cisco. Easy configuration is not a strong point. Firewalling, routing and QOS is all easier to set up on Linux/BSD than on Cisco. Or at least on OpenBSD, can't say I'm a fan of iptables.
It's also a bonus not having to deal with the awful CLI interface of IOS (it almost makes edlin look user friendly).
While the networking part is also getting some serious love, I'm not sure that it's ever going to be competitive with Cisco or Juniper. Linux or the BSDs still aren't at that level.
Note: Juniper routers run a custom version of FreeBSD.
Furthermore, it's the only UNIX out there still in development (AIX or HP-UX don't seem to get any love lately), and it's that good that it's actually worth giving up RHEL for it.
And MacOS X is also certified UNIX, and still under heavy development.
Edited 2009-09-11 17:44 UTC
While the networking part is also getting some serious love, I'm not sure that it's ever going to be competitive with Cisco or Juniper. Linux or the BSDs still aren't at that level.
From Cisco's giant Nexus 7000 10-Gig switches, Juniper megaswitches, F5's BIG-IP/LTM, to consumer grade wireless access points, I don't know of a single network vendor that uses Solaris (or OpenSolaris) as a base operating system. Cisco, Juniper, F5, all the major networking companies use Linux or FreeBSD (or the other BSDs).
Edited 2009-09-11 22:29 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-28
The cool thing about SPARC is that it's really fast. I couldn't believe the results of a $5000 Sun T1000 server, just a few weeks ago. And it's entry level that's going to be EOL-ed.
Currently they are investing in two areas in Solaris: Storage and Networking.
If the Solaris storage part (ZFS, Lustre/ZFS and Cluster) get's a few more features it's going to fly by NetApp, EMC and the rest. It's almost a complete solution. Regardless of what anyone thinks about ZFS, it's like comparing Windows XP and Snow Leopard. ZFS just works and it works easier than anything else on the market. Storage administration is fun again thanks to ZFS. Sure, you might be able to do the same things with solutions from other vendors, but they either come at a very high cost or they are less than easy to administer.
While the networking part is also getting some serious love, I'm not sure that it's ever going to be competitive with Cisco or Juniper. Linux or the BSDs still aren't at that level. For easy tasks, they work, but if you need firewall, content inspection, routing and QOS, it starts becoming a head-ache. A free head-ache, but a head-ache nevertheless. I can't imagine Solaris being less of a head-ache. It's probable going to be a bit easier to administer in some aspects, but I don't think a general purpose OS can go there.
Everything in Solaris fortunately just works as expected. Furthermore, it's the only UNIX out there still in development (AIX or HP-UX don't seem to get any love lately), and it's that good that it's actually worth giving up RHEL for it.