Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Sep 2005 11:15 UTC, submitted by Sansta
Thread beginning with comment 38335
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: YIPPY FOR FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by DigitalAxis on Fri 30th Sep 2005 13:36
in reply to "RE[4]: YIPPY FOR FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
RE[5]: YIPPY FOR FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by on Fri 30th Sep 2005 14:23
in reply to "RE[4]: YIPPY FOR FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
rehdon
Very good comment. Precise and clear. (I followed this story since a month). wikipedia - OpenDocument is also a good starting point to learn about this.
I must say I'm quite disappointed by OSNews lately ...
I tend to agree with you. The problem is not in OSNews, too many people give or have an opinion without undestanding about what they are talking. The same can be said with other forums.
Regards.




Member since:
2005-07-06
First of all, unless the title you gave to the entry is exactly the same of the article you link to (I refuse to give them a single hit, so you'll have to answer this one), it smacks of editor bias all over the place.
Secondly, you're an editor, so you're supposed to know better than the flame-happy kids lurking here around: it's not about dissing Microsoft, because no one is preventing them to support OpenDocument; they don't want to because they can't accept the idea of having a competitor to their Office suite.
The goal is to insure data accessibility: this is not possible with Microsoft's data format, because they're not open standard and they are subject to patents. The Adobe format, while not truly an open standard because it is controlled by the company which originated it, is more open in its usage terms and is not put at risk by the patent threat.
There, is the situation a little bit clearer now? If you want to know more go read this article on Groklaw:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050925165302314
especially Gary Edwards' comment at the end.
I must say I'm quite disappointed by OSNews lately ...
rehdon