Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Sep 2009 22:29 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 383419
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia
by IkeKrull on Fri 11th Sep 2009 07:04
in reply to "RE[5]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia"
RE[7]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia
by lemur2 on Fri 11th Sep 2009 12:36
in reply to "RE[6]: Only one choice for solid 3D under Linux - Nvidia"
I thought you wanted to wait for the benchmarks before passing judgement?
Just keep digging your hole mate, its pretty funny.
Just keep digging your hole mate, its pretty funny.
WTF?
Those weren't my judgements, they were judgements made by people who had run the development versions of the driver code.
What is wrong with you that makes you such a cranky sourpuss? Exactly what barrow are you trying to push?





Member since:
2007-02-17
"May not be 100% stable yet" means that there is still testing to be done, it doesn't mean that it is necessarily buggy.
"I'm sure we can make things a lot faster" means it probably hasn't been profiled and optimised, it doesn't mean that it is slow.
I posted earlier quoting other testers on the Phoronix radeon forum ... it was decribed as "fast and stable" for them.
So your description that it will be "basically functional, but may crash, and are slow" is purely wishful thinking on your part.
I gave direct quotes from independent people who have run David's code. They found it to be QUOTE: "fast and stable". QUOTE: "stabilizing quickly". QUOTE: "I am *still* surprised how well it all came together." You are just guessing and speculating about it, and badmouthing it before it has even been through staging.
What precisely is your agenda here?
Edited 2009-09-11 04:42 UTC