Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Sep 2009 22:29 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 383764
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2007-02-17
If you can't fix any issues with the code or do some coding yourself then you're still subject to the whims of whomever is developing the driver, OSS or not. So you're still not in control of your own machine.
There were two or three different FOSS projects developing a driver for ATI garphics cards, given the documentation from ATI.
There was the radeonhd project at Novell (I think) and then this project for which the driver was called radeon. I think there may have been one other.
This project ended up being a merge of a few different codebases, AFAIK. There were a couple of different approaches taken.
So no, with FOSS, you are often not dependent on the whims of one developer. The best effort often gets there first, amongst a couple of different efforts or sometimes a handful.
It is a meritocarcy. The best solution (as determined by what works best and what answers the most needs) wins. Other solutions either drop by the wayside, or go on to become an alternative choice.
Edited 2009-09-13 08:15 UTC