Linked by snydeq on Mon 14th Sep 2009 21:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 384102
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I dont ming a GPL program being released in two versions - a free and a closed source. Sort of like mysql or virtualbox. My problem comes from the fact hat they don't provide a free version at all.
That is exactly what they are doing. There is nothing magical about the "commercial" version of Mono included in MonoTouch except it does not come with the "no static linking" clause of the LGPL. It is the exact same code.
Mono's .Net classes are exactly the same as well, and are still MIT. (No special licensing required.)
The part that is proprietary is the CocoaTouch libraries which were developed solely by Novell and have never been open source.







Member since:
2005-07-06
Sure, they've been telling it up front all the time.
My problem is when they start closing it up without doing a free version at all.
I dont ming a GPL program being released in two versions - a free and a closed source. Sort of like mysql or virtualbox. My problem comes from the fact hat they don't provide a free version at all.
They have the legal right to do so - but IMO they also have a moral right to release a free version.