Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Sep 2009 16:28 UTC, submitted by Robert Escue
Thread beginning with comment 384194
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The reason they BSD UNIX systems like FreeBSD or NetBSD do not have the certification sign is propably because of the price...
The price might be one reason. Another one is that they do not comply to POSIX and Single Unix Specification. By current standards *BSD is Unix as much as Linux is - it is not.
It's also because nobody gives a flying fart about Unix certification anymore, and never really did.
Unix certification means about as much as the color of the icons on your installation cdroms.
FFS both AIX and OS X are 'Unix certified' and they almost nothing in common. It's completely worthless and it's sole purpose of existance as a certification is to generate revenue on the part of the trademark holders and to fill in bullet points in the advertising media of the OS vendors.
Nobody with half a brain has given as shit for about 10 years now.





Member since:
2006-11-18
The reason they BSD UNIX systems like FreeBSD or NetBSD do not have the certification sign is propably because of the price you have to pay for it:

Shipments (Units) ........ Annual Fee
Up to 1 000 ............... $25 000
1 000 to 30 000 .......... $50 000
more than 30 000 ........ $110 000
source: http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/Brandfees.htm
... and generally, why pay if you already are UNIX?
The most funny part is that you have to pay all this money for every architecture you want you UNIX to be certified on ... imagine the price for NetBSD ...