Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Sep 2009 16:28 UTC, submitted by Robert Escue
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y Apart from Linux and the various BSD operating systems, there's another open source UNIX-like operating system (actually, it's a certified UNIX): OpenSolaris. There are a few key differences between Linux and OpenSolaris, and TuxRadar lists some of them so that Linux users can dive right into Solaris.
Thread beginning with comment 384199
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: So defensive!
by binarycrusader on Tue 15th Sep 2009 20:46 UTC in reply to "RE: So defensive!"
binarycrusader
Member since:
2005-07-06

One of the reasons might be that Sun, while being very generous with their own Open Source contributions, spoiled their image by backing SCO financially, and did a sort of mini-crusade against Linux before ramping up their OpenSolaris project. Cooking up the CDDL license that is intentionally not GPL compatible didn't help either.


Sorry, but this is completely untrue. At the time, SCO was shaking their legal fist at everyone involved with UNIX or GNU/Linux. Sun was *legally required* to license certain rights from SCO. Remember that Sun is a publicly traded company, so unlike most GNU/Linux distributions has a lot more legal requirements to worry about.

They did not "fund SCO" anymore than customers of SCO that licensed copies of SCO Unix did.

Edited 2009-09-15 20:51 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[3]: So defensive!
by vivainio on Thu 17th Sep 2009 17:52 in reply to "RE[2]: So defensive!"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26

Sorry, but this is completely untrue. At the time, SCO was shaking their legal fist at everyone involved with UNIX or GNU/Linux. Sun was *legally required* to license certain rights from SCO.


Actually, nobody was legally required to give SCO anything. They got all their money from Microsoft and Sun. Coincidence, no? Why not SGI, HP...?

They did not "fund SCO" anymore than customers of SCO that licensed copies of SCO Unix did.


Yeah, if some company suddenly found need for 50000 SCO licenses right when the scam started, it would have raised some eyebrows as well.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: So defensive!
by binarycrusader on Sun 20th Sep 2009 04:53 in reply to "RE[3]: So defensive!"
binarycrusader Member since:
2005-07-06

Actually, nobody was legally required to give SCO anything. They got all their money from Microsoft and Sun. Coincidence, no? Why not SGI, HP...?


SGI and HP weren't launching a new operating system based on UNIX in 2005 either were they?

Think about it. Then think about all of the items Sun has open sourced since then. Then make the connection between licensing and software.

"They did not "fund SCO" anymore than customers of SCO that licensed copies of SCO Unix did.


Yeah, if some company suddenly found need for 50000 SCO licenses right when the scam started, it would have raised some eyebrows as well.
"

Your speculation is nothing more than that; speculation.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2