Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Thu 17th Sep 2009 05:32 UTC, submitted by ebasconp
Thread beginning with comment 384618
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-11-23
Great! Recently I loved the way DFBSD works. It's not as bloated as FBSD, it doesn't incorporate half-baked stuff [except of hammerfs, but it's understandble] and I had fewer problems with DFBSD, than with FBSD. I had to admit the failure of FBSD - IMO it went a wrong way. Most of the things in FBSD are overcomplicated to me at some point. DFBSD doesn't lack simplicity, so I find it perfect alternative for FBSD. IT actually reminds me of my everyday-use OS of choice, which is OpenBSD.