Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Sep 2009 13:40 UTC, submitted by Robert Escue
Hardware, Embedded Systems This is an article which discusses the increase in storage capacity while performance and hard error rates have not improved significantly in years, and what this means for protecting data in large storage systems. "The concept of parity-based RAID (levels 3, 5 and 6) is now pretty old in technological terms, and the technology's limitations will become pretty clear in the not-too-distant future " and are probably obvious to some users already. In my opinion, RAID-6 is a reliability Band Aid for RAID-5, and going from one parity drive to two is simply delaying the inevitable."
Thread beginning with comment 384856
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
werfu
Member since:
2005-09-15

You're right on the price, but there is one point where the SAS drives win: 8x10k SAS drive is way more faster than 3x any 1TB SATA drive available on the market. And even not taking the hard drive rotation speed into consideration, SAS is more efficient than SATA.

Reply Parent Score: 1

bannor99 Member since:
2005-09-15

Whether you keep SAS interfaces or switch to SATA, the real issue here is the reliability of hard disks.

Solid state disks should and will be the solution.

Reply Parent Score: 1

zlynx Member since:
2005-07-20

Flash memory (if that is what you mean by solid state) fails over time as well.

Reply Parent Score: 2