Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Sep 2009 13:40 UTC, submitted by Robert Escue
Thread beginning with comment 384872
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I thought modern raid systems used error correcting codes, which means even random bad bits did not irreversible damage the data if there was a drive failure.
What am I missing?
PS. My days of studying raid-systems was over a decade ago.
What am I missing?
PS. My days of studying raid-systems was over a decade ago.
True if you are running a system that actually does checksumming, like NetApp or ZFS. But many lower end systems do not. Even if you have checksumming and so can detect, say, a flipped bit in a sector that you need for reconstructing a stripe, you would need a second parity stream to reconstruct the stripe (one for the dead disk's missing sectors, one for the "bad" sector from the otherwise "good" disk). So IMHO multiple-parity raid plus checksumming is a great idea, if you have to use parity raid that is.






Member since:
2005-07-06
I thought modern raid systems used error correcting codes, which means even random bad bits did not irreversible damage the data if there was a drive failure.
What am I missing?
PS. My days of studying raid-systems was over a decade ago.