Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 18th Sep 2009 13:40 UTC, submitted by Robert Escue
Thread beginning with comment 385130
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: redundant SATA storage is generally very cheap
by zlynx on Mon 21st Sep 2009 20:12
in reply to "RE[2]: redundant SATA storage is generally very cheap"
RE[4]: redundant SATA storage is generally very cheap
by MamiyaOtaru on Tue 22nd Sep 2009 06:40
in reply to "RE[3]: redundant SATA storage is generally very cheap"





Member since:
2005-09-15
Whether you keep SAS interfaces or switch to SATA, the real issue here is the reliability of hard disks.
Solid state disks should and will be the solution.