Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Tue 22nd Sep 2009 16:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 385493
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Whoops. You're right. Sorry about that. Fixed.
And thanks for expounding on the history of the processor. That was very interesting. So if your professor (or the text) was correct, I deem that the processor could have run faster and worked harder if Motorola had built it with all of the transistors that it could have supported. Interesting.




Member since:
2005-07-06
They wish. Chop off one zero.
They only used 40000 transistors, but I was told by a professor (or I read in a text; it was 20 years ago) that the name indicated how many transistors Motorola thought they could fit on the chip. Although it wouldn't surprise me if it was also due to Motorola's previous 8-bit family, the 68xx.
It was an extremely well designed processor, running the Amigas of the time, too, and later the Palm PDA.