Linked by Jitesh Dundas on Wed 23rd Sep 2009 08:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 385716
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Logic vs emotion - that's a motivation
by jabbotts on Wed 23rd Sep 2009 15:46
in reply to "Logic vs emotion"
One of the motivations of AI research seems to be replicating human traits to understand them better. Want to understand how an eye works, replicate it and see what functions are required and flaws presented. Thought being more so, the closer we get to replicating the functions of the mushy grey ball of goo.. the more we learn about how it functions.
Let's just hope we've evolved beyond the point where the first thought is "how can I use this to manipulate other arrogant apes for my own benefit?".






Member since:
2006-01-10
I remember seeing a presentation (can't remember by whom) who basically says that we have emotion allow us to act when we don't have enough information.

We can rarely make a perfectly objective rational calculated choice. We have some information. But in general, we just need to do something.
You could spend eternity deciding where and what to eat for dinner. At the end of the day, you need emotion to just make that decision.
I could certainly imagine that we could get a computer to act human in time. I don't think we're close at all, but we could get there.
The problem I think will be that as we discover how to program the computer to act human, the more we'll discover just programmable humans are. Maybe that all our emotions, all our decisions can be represented in a computer with some random weightings