Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 30th Sep 2005 10:32 UTC, submitted by Magnum
Thread beginning with comment 38609
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't know of any right now; that doesn't mean there can't be one, though. This is probably the biggest thing that bothers me about you people--you compare a feature-less procedural language (C, C++, etc) to a relatively feature-rich OOP language (C++, Java) and proclaim that procedural sucks.
-bytecoder
No I don’t! Thanks for generalizing! I’m actually searching for a good and modern procedural (and modular) programming language. I want some functional in it too, but dirty functional. I don’t want to be nailed down on the no side effects thing. I want to pass functions without using function pointers, and I want to iterate over arrays without having to write int i = 0; i < 100; i++.






Member since:
Do you know a decent procedural language? To me they all show their age.