Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 386121
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Do try to keep up with things.
Read for comprehension. I said that Chrome has an "abysmal security record." There's nothing in the paragraph that you provided that refutes the previous paragraph:
"Soon after Chrome was first released in September 2008, vulnerabilities were discovered and loudly trumpeted. The new browser was quickly labeled insecure days after it was made available, and remained so until a patched version was released."
"Do try to keep up with things.
Read for comprehension. I said that Chrome has an "abysmal security record." " Read for comprehension yourself.
Chrome's security record is superlative compared to IE's security record. Absolutely wonderful ... even if a very early version of Chrome did once have a security hole think about the long and utterly abysmal history of IE ... shudder!!
If you are going to prattle about "ah but IE8 is much better, and ancient history about older IE browsers is not relevant" ... then be advised that Google Chrome Frame has a PERFECT security record ... because (according to that muddle-head thinking) we should not after all worry about previous versions.
Edited 2009-09-25 05:16 UTC




Member since:
2007-02-17
Um, dude, no.
http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/microsoft-google-chro...
Do try to keep up with things.