Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Sep 2009 19:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 386259
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Microsoft is right
by emilsedgh on Fri 25th Sep 2009 17:41
in reply to "RE[2]: Microsoft is right"
RE[3]: Microsoft is right
by lemur2 on Sat 26th Sep 2009 12:23
in reply to "RE[2]: Microsoft is right"
Right, but if there is even one vulnerability in WebKit, it is a vulnerability that would not have been there had the WebKit plugin not been installed. That is the genius of Microsoft's statement. It doesn't matter that WebKit makes IE more secure than it is now.
Google disagree, perhaps unsurprisingly.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138522/Google_barks_back_at...
Google barks back at Microsoft over Chrome Frame security
Defends plug-in, says it makes IE more secure, not less.
Google hit back at Microsoft today, defending the security of its new Chrome Frame plug-in and claiming that the software actually makes Internet Explorer (IE) safer and more secure.
Defends plug-in, says it makes IE more secure, not less.
Google hit back at Microsoft today, defending the security of its new Chrome Frame plug-in and claiming that the software actually makes Internet Explorer (IE) safer and more secure.
Microsoft's statement was in no way "genius", it was just self-serving FUD.
Edited 2009-09-26 12:24 UTC




Member since:
2008-10-30
Right, but if there is even one vulnerability in WebKit, it is a vulnerability that would not have been there had the WebKit plugin not been installed. That is the genius of Microsoft's statement. It doesn't matter that WebKit makes IE more secure than it is now.