Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th Sep 2009 16:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 386622
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Your statement is false
by Mellin on Mon 28th Sep 2009 18:32
in reply to "RE: Your statement is false"
and microsoft installs add ons to FF without asking at all
http://techgeist.net/2009/05/microsoft-installs-firefox-add-ons-san...
RE[3]: Your statement is false
by KrimZon on Mon 28th Sep 2009 19:26
in reply to "RE[2]: Your statement is false"
RE[2]: Your statement is false
by lemur2 on Mon 28th Sep 2009 23:36
in reply to "RE: Your statement is false"
Apple has - again - used its software UPDATER to install new software, making it LOOK like an update. In what universe is that acceptable? What if Microsoft did this? The world'd be aflame!
Well, Microsoft does include an un-installable web browser and media player on every Windows machine in the stores, and it abuses its monopoly position to prevent those same stores from offering their customers a choice of pre-installed OS for the machines sold.
How is that behaviour any different in principle?
RE[3]: Your statement is false
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 28th Sep 2009 23:43
in reply to "RE[2]: Your statement is false"
RE[3]: Your statement is false
by JoostinOnline on Tue 29th Sep 2009 03:07
in reply to "RE[2]: Your statement is false"
I really don't see why people complain about that so much. They also install Notepad but no lawsuits have been made over that. Would you really buy (or download if it is free) an operating system if it started with bare minimum?
For example, you are going to need IE even if you only plan on using Firefox. Why don't you try to download an installation file without an internet browser. It can be done, but it isn't exactly easy.
Personally, I don't think that there is anything wrong with Windows having MS software pre-installed, or OS-X having Apple software pre-installed.
RE[2]: Your statement is false
by memson on Tue 29th Sep 2009 11:29
in reply to "RE: Your statement is false"
RE[3]: Your statement is false
by _txf_ on Tue 29th Sep 2009 15:28
in reply to "RE[2]: Your statement is false"





Member since:
2005-06-29
Lies.
The user has to choose to install the software by clicking an install button following the software description.
Push != install. Push as in, promote. Coerce. Trick.
Apple has - again - used its software UPDATER to install new software, making it LOOK like an update. In what universe is that acceptable? What if Microsoft did this? The world'd be aflame!
Edited 2009-09-28 18:00 UTC