Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Mon 28th Sep 2009 18:21 UTC, submitted by Michael
Thread beginning with comment 386786
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Pointless comparisson
by segedunum on Tue 29th Sep 2009 11:43
in reply to "RE[7]: Pointless comparisson"
Well, I disagree with you. I also have the feeling the the comparison is pointless actually.
We're still not furthering the point made by the OP about SMP. :-)
Historically, yes, Linux's SMP performance has been better than FreeBSD', largely because it has supported it for longer. I don't have a [meaningful] benchmark to hand, but there was one kicking around here several years ago which is probably why I can't find it now. However, the situation today has improved quite a bit:
http://lwn.net/Articles/271196/
Largely thanks to Linux retrofitting CFS in at the time, competition from NetBSD with FreeBSD:
http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/07/0323212
and specific improvements to FreeBSD regarding SMP. The situation with FreeBSD has certainly changed quite a bit from this:
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/000203.html
They always seem to be based on MySQL.
So, the impression the OP had about Linux and FreeBSD SMP was correct, at one time, but not any longer it seems.
RE[9]: Pointless comparisson
by strcpy on Tue 29th Sep 2009 18:05
in reply to "RE[8]: Pointless comparisson"







Member since:
2006-08-29
Your comment was pointless because you added nothing whatsoever to the discussion. [...] "
Well, I disagree with you. I also have the feeling the the comparison is pointless actually. And that's IMO, adding something to the discussion.