Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Sep 2009 08:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 386817
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Watch your language please!
by Almindor on Wed 30th Sep 2009 06:52
in reply to "RE: Watch your language please!"
I disagree with you here. While the definition itself doesn't hold a negative meaning, labeling someone a "watchdog" implies (to me at least) that they are overprotective and the "dog" in the name can also bring associations to being less than human. All in all a negativistic portreyal and I also thought at first that Thom didn't agree with her and thought she's way over her head with this.
Calling her an overseer or such would be much more better if it was ment to be a compliment.




Member since:
2006-01-01
No, no it isn't. Next time, please look up the meaning of a term if you are unsure of what it means. It has nothing to do with insulting, it is actually used to mean "overseer" or "person who keeps an eye on things" or "person who looks out for wrong doing".