Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Sep 2009 19:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 386910
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What's the problem
by unoengborg on Wed 30th Sep 2009 11:31
in reply to "RE: What's the problem"
Come on, without Google Maps, Gmail and the google calendar, an android phone wouldn't be the same. There's no real need for the market, but the others are essential, at least to me.
Of course at least google maps can be installed 'aftermarket' or so I believe.
Of course at least google maps can be installed 'aftermarket' or so I believe.
IMHO, the google applications are not that good. For one thing I don't like to trust google with my personal information such as my contacts, my calendar events, or my e-mail, or to do lists. I want something with similar userinterface that stores data on my own servers. Google maps don't even give voice directions, wich makes it useless while driving.
So there would be a lot of things to improve if I evver find the time to write replacements.






Member since:
2005-07-06
Free and open source software would be nowhere without copyright law. The copyrigth law is what makes it possible for us, to ensure that our applications remains free and open. As free software developers we should respect that law even when it is not to our emediate advantage if we want to be taken seriously.
In this case, I have a hard time to see that google actually get hurt from this, but if they claim they do, this should be respected.
Frankly, these google applications are not all that good, and leave a lot of room for improvement. Given how much Cyanogen have improved the free parts of Android they could probably have made free alternatives that have blown the closed source google versions away. According to the article this is one of the alternatives the developers consider. When that happens, Google will look rather stupid.
Edited 2009-09-29 21:33 UTC