Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 1st Oct 2009 21:02 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu We reported earlier on a blog post entitled "Ubuntu Report Card (2009)" where the author detailed how they felt the Ubuntu experience had improved over the years. In a follow-up series of articles looking at the future, Tanner Helland has written 10 different broadly-scoped feature requests that [he] 'and many others would like to see by the time Ubuntu 10.10 rolls around'.
Thread beginning with comment 387310
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: No ...
by Bobthearch on Fri 2nd Oct 2009 03:49 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: No ..."
Bobthearch
Member since:
2006-01-27

The GPL ideology needs to go, there's nothing wrong with proprietary software. Programmers need to get paid like everyone else.


I'd argue that a good operating system needs both. Look at Windows for example. A fantastic selection of open source and freeware programs written by FOSS community, hobbiests, gov't, educational organizations, etc. And right alongside of that is a full lineup of commercial offerings - games, CAD, GIS, etc.

No need for the either/or ultimatum, pick and choose whatever you need from both.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[4]: No ...
by nt_jerkface on Fri 2nd Oct 2009 05:08 in reply to "RE[3]: No ..."
nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

I have no problem with open source. I do have a problem with people who push an ideology that demonizes proprietary software developers.

If you think a good OS should have both then you should probably avoid Linux because every distro is designed around open source.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[5]: No ...
by lemur2 on Fri 2nd Oct 2009 10:12 in reply to "RE[4]: No ..."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

I have no problem with open source. I do have a problem with people who push an ideology that demonizes proprietary software developers.


Why would anyone do that?

The only people who might deserve demonizing are those who would demonize you. An eye for an eye, as it were ...

Now there do seem to be a lot of proprietary software developers who want to endlessly try to discredit open source. In reality, open source is just self-help collaboration, so why on earth should it be disparaged?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[5]: No ...
by boldingd on Fri 2nd Oct 2009 15:33 in reply to "RE[4]: No ..."
boldingd Member since:
2009-02-19

You are somewhat misinformed. The FSF is not every Open Source developer. For every loud-mouthed zealot, there's an enormous corpus of normal programmers, who just want to create decent, usable software, that benefits them. Using Linux, or Open Source software in general, does not require that one subscribe to a particular philosophy; some will push it, yes, but more won't, and you'll be able to get along pretty well without anyone force-feeding you kool-aide.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5