Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Oct 2009 22:27 UTC, submitted by twitterfire
Hardware, Embedded Systems We already introduced Dell's new laptop wonder, the Z600, to you earlier this week. What makes this laptop special is that it contains a small ARM motherboard which runs a special version of openSUSE Linux, allowing for instant access to basic functionality like checking email, browsing the web, and playing multimedia files. What's news, at least for OSNews, is that research from Dell has shown that people spent 70% of their time in the Linux environment.
Thread beginning with comment 387666
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Linux visibiliity
by Rahul on Sun 4th Oct 2009 16:34 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Linux visibiliity"
Rahul
Member since:
2005-07-06

Sorry, that's not the case either. It is just a repeated myth. They have several FSF/GNU software licensed under LGPL or more permissive licenses. RMS himself recommended using MIT license for the Ogg codecs reference implementation. Look it up.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[8]: Linux visibiliity
by DrillSgt on Sun 4th Oct 2009 16:53 in reply to "RE[7]: Linux visibiliity"
DrillSgt Member since:
2005-12-02

Sorry, that's not the case either. It is just a repeated myth. They have several FSF/GNU software licensed under LGPL or more permissive licenses. RMS himself recommended using MIT license for the Ogg codecs reference implementation. Look it up.


I have looked it up, repeatedly over the years. The MIT license is also known as the X11 license, and is on the list of software compatible with the GNU GPL. You referenced the licenses that were incompatible with the GNU GPL, which is the ones they get mad at you for using. At least that is the portion of the page your link took me to.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[9]: Linux visibiliity
by Rahul on Sun 4th Oct 2009 17:20 in reply to "RE[8]: Linux visibiliity"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06

They don't recommend but they still acknowledge as free software licenses. Their definition doesn't exclude GPL incompatible licenses. That claim is bogus. So is the claim that they only recommend the GPL license.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[8]: Linux visibiliity
by nt_jerkface on Mon 5th Oct 2009 09:12 in reply to "RE[7]: Linux visibiliity"
nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

RMS is the least tolerant person in the software world.

He is the guy that won't do an interview unless Linux is referred to as GNU/Linux.

He believes that creating proprietary software is a criminal act.

If he had his way he would ban every license except the GPL. The LGPL only exists out of political necessity. RMS has even written an essay on why you shouldn't use it for new libraries.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[9]: Linux visibiliity
by Rahul on Mon 5th Oct 2009 13:57 in reply to "RE[8]: Linux visibiliity"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06

In my conversations with RMS, he has been a very very tolerant person actually. Like I said he has recommended other licenses such as MIT on occasions before. He has certain principles but he has historically been a very pragmatic person.

I know that is not the image you get if you don't deal with him personally but don't judge people before you really get to know them

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1